Minimally Invasive Surgery for Mild-to-Moderate Adult Spinal Deformities: Impact on Intensive Care Unit and Hospital Stay.

OBJECTIVE: To compare circumferential minimally invasive (cMIS) versus open surgeries for mild-to-moderate adult spinal deformity (ASD) with regard to intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital lengths of stay (LOS). METHODS: A retrospective review of 2 multicenter ASD databases with 426 ASD (sagittal vertical axis <6 cm) surgery patients with 4 or more fusion levels and 2-year follow-up was conducted. ICU stay, LOS, and estimated blood loss (EBL) were compared between open and cMIS surgeries. RESULTS: Propensity matching resulted in 88 patients (44 cMIS, 44 open). cMIS were older (61 vs. 53 years, P = 0.005). Mean levels fused were 6.5 in cMIS and 7.1 in open (P = 0.368). Preoperative lordosis was higher in open than in cMIS (42.7° vs. 40.9°, P = 0.016), and preoperative visual analog score back pain was greater in open than in cMIS (7 vs. 6.2, P = 0.033). Preoperative and postoperative spinopelvic parameters and coronal Cobb angles were not different. EBL was 534 cc in cMIS and 1211 cc in open (P < 0.001). Transfusions were less in cMIS (27.3% vs. 70.5%, P < 0.001). ICU stay was 0.6 days for cMIS and 1.2 days for open (P = 0.009). Hospital LOS was 7.9 days for cMIS versus 9.6 for open (P = 0.804). CONCLUSIONS: For patients with mild-to-moderate ASD, cMIS surgery had a significantly lower EBL and shorter ICU stay. Major and minor complication rates were lower in cMIS patients than open patients. Overall LOS was shorter in cMIS patients, but did not reach statistical significance.

Early and Late Reoperation Rates With Various MIS Techniques for Adult Spinal Deformity Correction.

STUDY DESIGN: A multicenter retrospective review of an adult spinal deformity database. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to characterize reoperation rates and etiologies of adult spinal deformity surgery with circumferential minimally invasive surgery (cMIS) and hybrid (HYB) techniques. METHODS: Inclusion criteria were age ≥18 years, and one of the following: coronal Cobb >20°, sagittal vertical axis >5 cm, pelvic tilt >20°, and pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis >10°. Patients with either cMIS or HYB surgery, ≥3 spinal levels treated with 2-year minimum follow-up were included. RESULTS: A total of 133 patients met inclusion for this study (65 HYB and 68 cMIS). Junctional failure (13.8%) was the most common reason for reoperation in the HYB group, while fixation failure was the most common reason in the cMIS group (14.7%). There was a higher incidence of proximal junctional failure (PJF) than distal junctional failure (DJF) within HYB (12.3% vs 3.1%), but no significant differences in PJF or DJF rates when compared to cMIS. Early (<30 days) reoperations were less common (cMIS = 1.5%; HYB = 6.1%) than late (>30 days) reoperations (cMIS = 26.5%; HYB = 27.7%), but early reoperations were more common in the HYB group after propensity matching, largely due to infection rates (10.8% vs 0%, P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: Adult spinal deformity correction with cMIS and HYB techniques result in overall reoperation rates of 27.9% and 33.8%, respectively, at minimum 2-year follow-up. Junctional failures are more common after HYB approaches, while pseudarthrosis/fixation failures happen more often with cMIS techniques. Early reoperations were less common than later returns to the operating room in both groups, but cMIS demonstrated less risk of infection and early reoperation when compared with the HYB group.

Treatment of the Fractional Curve of Adult Scoliosis With Circumferential Minimally Invasive Surgery Versus Traditional, Open Surgery: An Analysis of Surgical Outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective, multicenter review of adult scoliosis patients with minimum 2-year follow-up. OBJECTIVE: Because the fractional curve (FC) of adult scoliosis can cause radiculopathy, we evaluated patients treated with either circumferential minimally invasive surgery (cMIS) or open surgery. METHODS: A multicenter retrospective adult deformity review was performed. Patients included: age >18 years with FC >10°, ≥3 levels of instrumentation, 2-year follow-up, and one of the following: coronal Cobb angle (CCA) > 20°, pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) > 10°, pelvic tilt (PT) > 20°, and sagittal vertical axis (SVA) > 5 cm. RESULTS: The FC was treated in 118 patients, 79 open and 39 cMIS. The FCs had similar coronal Cobb angles preoperative (17° cMIS, 19.6° open) and postoperative (7° cMIS, 8.1° open), but open had more levels treated (12.1 vs 5.7). cMIS patients had greater reduction in VAS leg (6.4 to 1.8) than open (4.3 to 2.5). With propensity matching 40 patients for levels treated (cMIS: 6.6 levels, N = 20; open: 7.3 levels, N = 20), both groups had similar FC correction (18° in both preoperative, 6.9° in cMIS and 8.5° postoperative). Open had more posterior decompressions (80% vs 22.2%, P < .001). Both groups had similar preoperative (Visual Analogue Scale [VAS] leg 6.1 cMIS and 5.4 open) and postoperative (VAS leg 1.6 cMIS and 3.1 open) leg pain. All cMIS patients had interbody grafts; 35% of open did. There was no difference in change of primary CCA, PI-LL, LL, Oswestry Disability Index, or VAS Back. CONCLUSION: Patients' FCs treated with cMIS had comparable reduction of leg pain compared with those treated with open surgery, despite significantly fewer cMIS patients undergoing direct decompression.

Construct Levels to Anchored Levels Ratio and Rod Diameter Are Associated With Implant-Related Complications in Traditional Growing Rods.

INTRODUCTION: In addition to patient characteristics, consideration of length of construct to number of anchored levels ratio and rod diameter should be a part of preoperative planning to minimize implant-related complications (IRCs). IRCs including rod breakage, anchor dislodgement, and pullout are among the most common adverse events in traditional growing rods (TGRs). The current study hypothesized that anchor type and configuration are associated with IRC. METHODS: Patients with (1) age ≤10 years at surgery; (2) spine-based dual TGR; (3) minimum 2-year follow-up; and (4) available imaging. Cephalad and caudal foundations were grouped based on the number of instrumented levels and anchor type. All radiographs were reviewed. Based on the results, a "construct levels / anchored levels" (CL/AL) ratio was calculated, which is the number of levels spanned by instrumentation divided by the number of levels with bone-anchor fixation. Receiver operating characteristic curve was used to define the CL/AL threshold. RESULTS: 274 patients divided into patients with complications (IRC+, n = 140) and without complications (IRC-, n = 134) groups. Mean follow-up was 6.3 years (2.1-18.0 years). No significant differences in age, gender, body mass index, ambulatory status, etiology, primary curve size, T1-S1 height, coronal and sagittal balance, and rod material were observed between the two groups. Comparative analysis showed that connector type, presence and location of crosslinks, number of levels instrumented, number and type of anchors, presence of pelvic fixation, and mirroring of cephalad and caudal foundations were not different. However, maximum kyphosis and rod diameter were significantly different. The CL/AL ratio threshold was 3.5. Multivariate analysis of kyphosis, rod diameter, and CL/AL ratio showed a significant association with IRC (p < .05). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Although patient characteristics like kyphosis have been proven to be associated with instrumentation failure, it is a combination of characteristics that include rod diameter and CL/AL ratio that showed significant correlation with IRC. Validation of the CL/AL ratio is recommended.

Patients with High Pelvic Tilt Achieve the Same Clinical Success as Those with Low Pelvic Tilt After Minimally Invasive Adult Deformity Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Pelvic tilt (PT) is a compensatory mechanism for adult spinal deformity patients to mitigate sagittal imbalance. The association between preop PT and postop clinical and radiographic outcomes has not been well studied in patients undergoing minimally invasive adult deformity surgery. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate clinical and radiographic outcomes in adult spinal deformity patients with high and low preoperative PT treated surgically using less invasive techniques. METHODS: Retrospective case-control, institutional review board-approved study. A multicenter, minimally invasive surgery spinal deformity patient database was queried for 2-yr follow-up with complete radiographic and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) data. Hybrid surgery patients were excluded. Inclusion criteria were as follows: age > 18 and either coronal Cobb angle > 20, sagittal vertical axis > 5 cm, pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) > 10 or PT > 20. Patients were stratified by preop PT as per Schwab classification: low (PT< 20), mid (PT 20-30), or high (>30). Postoperative radiographic alignment parameters (PT, PI, LL, Cobb angle, sagittal vertical axis) and HRQOL data (Visual Analog Scale Back/Leg, Oswestry Disability Index) were evaluated and analyzed. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-five patients had complete 2-yr outcomes data, and 64 patients met inclusion criteria (25 low, 21 mid, 18 high PT). High PT group had higher preop PI-LL mismatch (32.1 vs 4.7; P < .001). At last follow-up, 76.5% of patients in the high PT group had continued PI-LL mismatch compared to 34.8% in the low PT group (P < .006). There was a difference between groups in terms of postop changes of PT (-3.9 vs 1.9), LL (8.7 vs 0.5), and PI-LL (-9.5 vs 0.1). Postoperatively, HRQOL data (Oswestry Disability Index and Visual Analog Scale) were significantly improved in both groups (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Adult deformity patients with high preoperative PT treated with minimally invasive surgical techniques had less radiographic success but equivalent clinical outcomes as patients with low PT.

Re-operation After Long-Segment Fusions for Adult Spinal Deformity: The Impact of Extending the Construct Below the Lumbar Spine.

BACKGROUND: Deciding where to end a long-segment fusion for adult spinal deformity (ASD) may be a challenge, particularly in the absence of an abnormality at L5/S1. Some suggest prophylactic extension of the construct to the sacrum and/or ilium (S/I) to protect against distal junctional failure, while others support terminating in the lower lumbar spine to preserve motion. OBJECTIVE: To compare the risk of re-operation after long-segment fusions for ASD that ends at L4 or L5 (L4/5) vs S/I. METHODS: A multicenter database of patients treated for ASD by circumferential minimally invasive surgery or hybrid surgical technique was screened for individuals with long fusions (≥4 vertebral levels) ending at L4 or below and with at least 2 yr of follow-up. Multivariate regression modeling was used to compare surgical morbidity between the L4/5 and S/I groups, and Cox proportional hazard modeling was used to compare risk of re-operation. RESULTS: There were 45 subjects with fusion to L4/5 and 71 to S/I. Over a 32-mo median follow-up, 41 re-operations were performed; 6 were for distal junctional failure. In those with normal or mild degeneration at L5/S1, fusion to S/I afforded no significant change in re-operative risk (hazard ratio = 1.18 [95% confidence interval: 0.53-2.62], P = .682). In those undergoing circumferential minimally invasive surgery correction, fusion to S/I was associated with significantly greater blood loss (499.6 cc, P < .001) and surgical time (97.5 min, P = .04). CONCLUSION: In the setting of a normal or mildly degenerated L5/S1 disc space, fusion to the sacrum/ilium did not significantly change the risk of requiring a re-operation after a long-segment fusion for ASD.

A Critical Analysis of Sagittal Plane Deformity Correction With Minimally Invasive Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: A 2-Year Follow-Up Study.

INTRODUCTION: Sagittal plane realignment is important to achieve desirable clinical outcomes after adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. This study evaluates the impact of minimally invasive (MIS) techniques on sagittal plane alignment and clinical outcomes in ASD patients. METHODS: A retrospective, multi-center review of ASD patients (age ≥18 years, and with one of the following: coronal Cobb ≥20°, sagittal vertical axis [SVA] >5 cm, and/or pelvic tilt >25°), MIS surgery, and four or more levels instrumented. Patients were stratified by baseline SRS-Schwab global alignment modifier (GAM) into three groups: 0 (SVA <4 cm), + (SVA 4-9.5 cm), or ++ (SVA >9.5 cm). Radiographic and clinical outcomes measures were analyzed with a minimum of 2-year follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 96 ASD patients were identified, and 63 met the study's inclusion criteria of circumferential MIS or posterior MIS only, with four or more levels instrumented (n: Group 0 = 37, Group + = 15, and Group ++ = 11). Group 0 was younger than ++ (56.8 vs. 69.6 years), with a higher proportion of females than Group + or ++ (83.8% vs. 66.7% and 54.5%, respectively). Baseline HRQoL was similar. Postoperatively, Groups 0 and + had improved Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and numeric rating scale (NRS) back and leg scores. Group ++ only had improvement in NRS scores. At the latest follow-up, Groups 0 and ++ had similar sagittal measurements except for PT (21.6 vs. 23.6, p = .009). The + group had improvement in PI-LL (24.2 to 17; p = .015) and LL (30.9 to 38.3; p = .013). Eight of 27 (21.6%) Group 0 patients deteriorated (4 to Group +, 4 to Group ++). Three of 15 (20.0%) Group + patients deteriorated to Group ++, and 3 improved to Group 0. Six of 11 (54.5%) Group ++ patients improved (3 to Group + and 3 to Group 0). CONCLUSIONS: MIS techniques successfully stabilized ASD patients with Group 0 and + deformities and improved HRQoL. This study suggests that severe sagittal imbalance is not adequately treated with MIS approaches.

Anterior Column Realignment has Similar Results to Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy in Treating Adults with Sagittal Plane Deformity.

OBJECTIVE: Anterior column realignment (ACR) is a minimally invasive surgical technique used for the correction of adult sagittal plane deformity. ACR is performed via a minimally invasive lateral transpsoas approach with anterior longitudinal ligament release and hyperlordotic cage placement. The objective of this study was to compare radiographic outcomes and complications in patients treated by ACR or Pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO). METHODS: Patients who underwent ACR were matched with patients from a retrospective PSO dataset, by pelvic incidence, lumbar lordosis, and thoracic kyphosis. Inclusion criteria included pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis mismatch > 10°, pelvic tilt > 25°, and/or C7 sagittal vertical axis >5 cm, and minimum 1-year follow-up. RESULTS: All (n = 17) patients who underwent ACR underwent second-stage open posterior instrumented fusion. There were no differences in baseline demographic or radiographic parameters. Both groups were found to have significant improvement from preoperative to final follow-up for lumbar lordosis, T1 spinopelvic inclination, and T1 pelvic angle. Pelvic tilt did not improve with PSO (31° to 28°) at final follow-up but did improve in ACR group (34° to 25°). No differences were identified at 3-month or final follow-up for lumbar lordosis (51° vs. 47°), pelvic tilt (25° vs. 28°), and T1 pelvic angle (23° vs. 24°). The group undergoing PSO achieved greater T1 spinopelvic inclination correction (8° vs. 1.9°). Patients who underwent ACR had significantly less estimated blood loss than patients who underwent PSO (1.6 vs. 3.6 L, respectively), but no difference in the overall major complication rates was found (35.3% vs. 41.2%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: ACR achieved similar radiographic results as PSO in a matched cohort with significantly less estimated blood loss and similar overall complication rate.

Utility of multilevel lateral interbody fusion of the thoracolumbar coronal curve apex in adult deformity surgery in combination with open posterior instrumentation and L5-S1 interbody fusion: a case-matched evaluation of 32 patients.

OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of supplementing long thoracolumbar posterior instrumented fusion (posterior spinal fusion, PSF) with lateral interbody fusion (LIF) of the lumbar/thoracolumbar coronal curve apex in adult spinal deformity (ASD). METHODS Two multicenter databases were evaluated. Adults who had undergone multilevel LIF of the coronal curve apex in addition to PSF with L5-S1 interbody fusion (LS+Apex group) were matched by number of posterior levels fused with patients who had undergone PSF with L5-S1 interbody fusion without LIF (LS-Only group). All patients had at least 2 years of follow-up. Percutaneous PSF and 3-column osteotomy (3CO) were excluded. Demographics, perioperative details, radiographic spinal deformity measurements, and HRQoL data were analyzed. RESULTS Thirty-two patients were matched (LS+Apex: 16; LS: 16) (6 men, 26 women; mean age 63 ± 10 years). Overall, the average values for measures of deformity were as follows: Cobb angle > 40°, sagittal vertical axis (SVA) > 6 cm, pelvic tilt (PT) > 25°, and mismatch between pelvic incidence (PI) and lumbar lordosis (LL) > 15°. There were no significant intergroup differences in preoperative radiographic parameters, although patients in the LS+Apex group had greater Cobb angles and less LL. Patients in the LS+Apex group had significantly more anterior levels fused (4.6 vs 1), longer operative times (859 vs 379 minutes), and longer length of stay (12 vs 7.5 days) (all p < 0.01). For patients in the LS+Apex group, Cobb angle, pelvic tilt (PT), lumbar lordosis (LL), PI-LL (lumbopelvic mismatch), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores, and visual analog scale (VAS) scores for back and leg pain improved significantly (p < 0.05). For patients in the LS-Only group, there were significant improvements in Cobb angle, ODI score, and VAS scores for back and leg pain. The LS+Apex group had better correction of Cobb angles (56% vs 33%, p = 0.02), SVA (43% vs 5%, p = 0.46), LL (62% vs 13%, p = 0.35), and PI-LL (68% vs 33%, p = 0.32). Despite more LS+Apex patients having major complications (56% vs 13%; p = 0.02) and postoperative leg weakness (31% vs 6%, p = 0.07), there were no intergroup differences in 2-year outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Long open posterior instrumented fusion with or without multilevel LIF is used to treat a variety of coronal and sagittal adult thoracolumbar deformities. The addition of multilevel LIF to open PSF with L5-S1 interbody support in this small cohort was often used in more severe coronal and/or lumbopelvic sagittal deformities and offered better correction of major Cobb angles, lumbopelvic parameters, and SVA than posterior-only operations. As these advantages came at the expense of more major complications, more leg weakness, greater blood loss, and longer operative times and hospital stays without an improvement in 2-year outcomes, future investigations should aim to more clearly define deformities that warrant the addition of multilevel LIF to open PSF and L5-S1 interbody fusion.

Rod fracture and lengthening intervals in traditional growing rods: is there a relationship?

PURPOSE: Is there any relationship between lengthening intervals and rod fracture in traditional growing rod (TGR) surgery? METHODS: A multicenter EOS database was queried for patients who had: (1) dual growing rods for EOS; (2) minimum 2-year follow-up; (3) a minimum of 2 lengthenings; and (4) revision surgery due to rod fracture. Of 138 patients who met the criteria: 56 patients experienced at least one-rod fracture (RF group) and 82 patients had no rod fractures (NRF group). In addition to each patient's lengthening intervals, demographics, construct details, and radiographic parameters were compared. RESULTS: RF and NRF patients had a mean pre-op age of 5.7 years (range 1.3-10.7) and 7.3 years (range 1.6-12.8), respectively (p < 0.001). There was no significant association between etiologies and rod fracture or between BMI and rod fracture (p = 0.979). There was no significant difference between lengthening intervals between the RF and NRF groups (p > 0.05). RF and NRF patients had statistically similar mean pre-op major curve size and max kyphosis (p = 0.279; p = 0.619, respectively). Stainless steel rods fractured more frequently compared with Titanium rods (SS 49.2 % vs. Ti 38 %; p = 0.004). Rod fracture occurred more in rods smaller than 4 mm (p = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: Lengthening intervals were not statistically different in RF and NRF groups and there was no association between lengthening interval and rod fracture in TGR cases. It was shown that patients who had rod fracture were younger and were more likely to have SS rods with smaller than 4 mm diameter.

Do Longer Surgical Procedures Result in Greater Contamination of Surgeons' Hands?

BACKGROUND: A surgical site infection is a substantial cause of complications in patients. Different methods are being used to decrease surgical site infections; however, these infections still can cause complications, especially in patients undergoing longer operations (> 3 hours). There is evidence that the efficacy of the scrubbing material fades after 3 hours. However, we do not know the longevity of hand cleanliness after application of scrubbing materials in a long operation. It can be postulated that if the surgeon's scrubbed hands are recolonized after a certain time, they may serve as a progressive source of contamination during surgery. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked: (1) Is there a correlation between surgical duration and hand contamination at the end of surgery? (2) At what point during surgery does hand contamination reach or exceed prescrub levels? METHODS: Three spine surgeons using the same scrubbing technique and materials consisting of chlorhexidine gluconate 1% solution and ethyl alcohol 61% w/w were enrolled in our study. Between December 2014 and April 2015, spine procedures of 3 hours or more, which were the first case of the day, were selected for this study (20 cases). Cases in which glove changing occurred (perforations, reprepping, and redraping) or cultures obtained after scrubbing were positive (indicative of insufficient hand sanitization) were excluded (0% of cases). Twenty cases (100% enrollment) were analyzed. Surgeons' hands were swabbed with sterile cotton tip applicators and 5 mL sterile phosphate-buffered saline before hand scrubbing (prescrub), immediately after hand scrubbing (postscrub), and immediately after surgery (postoperative). Results were reported in colony-forming units per milliliter. The correlation between duration of surgery and hand recontamination was tested by regression analysis of time versus colony-forming units per milliliter. Receiver-operating characteristic curve tested the cutoff point, where recontamination occurred. RESULTS: With a longer duration of surgery, more colony-forming units are recovered from gloved hands at the end of surgery (R = 0.94, R(2) = 0.89, p = 0.005). The receiver-operating characteristic curve suggested that 5 hours is the cutoff point for hand recolonization. At 5 hours, contamination reached or exceeded prescrub levels (area under the curve, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.23-1.0), whereas before 5 hours, there was no contamination detected at the end of surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that duration of surgery correlates with hand recontamination and at 5 hours, recolonization of a surgeon's hands become detectable. Recolonization may have started even earlier than 5 hours. However, these levels are not detectable in the laboratory at earlier times. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Based on this pilot study, rescrubbing is highly recommended before the fifth hour of an operation, ideally at some point between the fourth and fifth hours. FUTURE: We also recommend the surgical site infection rates in operations using rescrubbing should be compared with those from surgeries with just the conventional single-scrubbing technique, in a randomized controlled trial, to determine the effectiveness of this novel rescrubbing method.

Clinical and radiographic parameters associated with best versus worst clinical outcomes in minimally invasive spinal deformity surgery.

OBJECTIVE Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) techniques are increasingly used to treat adult spinal deformity. However, standard minimally invasive spinal deformity techniques have a more limited ability to restore sagittal balance and match the pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) than traditional open surgery. This study sought to compare "best" versus "worst" outcomes of MIS to identify variables that may predispose patients to postoperative success. METHODS A retrospective review of minimally invasive spinal deformity surgery cases was performed to identify parameters in the 20% of patients who had the greatest improvement in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores versus those in the 20% of patients who had the least improvement in ODI scores at 2 years' follow-up. RESULTS One hundred four patients met the inclusion criteria, and the top 20% of patients in terms of ODI improvement at 2 years (best group, 22 patients) were compared with the bottom 20% (worst group, 21 patients). There were no statistically significant differences in age, body mass index, pre- and postoperative Cobb angles, pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence, levels fused, operating room time, and blood loss between the best and worst groups. However, the mean preoperative ODI score was significantly higher (worse disability) at baseline in the group that had the greatest improvement in ODI score (58.2 vs 39.7, p < 0.001). There was no difference in preoperative PI-LL mismatch (12.8° best vs 19.5° worst, p = 0.298). The best group had significantly less postoperative sagittal vertical axis (SVA; 3.4 vs 6.9 cm, p = 0.043) and postoperative PI-LL mismatch (10.4° vs 19.4°, p = 0.027) than the worst group. The best group also had better postoperative visual analog scale back and leg pain scores (p = 0.001 and p = 0.046, respectively). CONCLUSIONS The authors recommend that spinal deformity surgeons using MIS techniques focus on correcting a patient's PI-LL mismatch to within 10° and restoring SVA to < 5 cm. Restoration of these parameters seems to impact which patients will attain the greatest degree of improvement in ODI outcomes, while the spines of patients who do the worst are not appropriately corrected and may be fused into a fixed sagittal plane deformity.

Case-Matched Comparison of Spinal Fusion Versus Growing Rods for Progressive Idiopathic Scoliosis in Skeletally Immature Patients.

STUDY DESIGN: Multicenter study of retrospectively and prospectively collected data. OBJECTIVES: To compare outcomes of spinal fusion (SF) versus growing rod (GR) surgery using a case-matched series. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Scoliosis surgeons face two distinct treatment options for progressive idiopathic scoliosis in skeletally immature patients: definitive SF or growth-friendly surgery such as GR. No previous studies have directly compared outcomes between these two techniques. METHODS: A multicenter database identified 11 GR patients who met the following criteria: (1) idiopathic etiology; (2) 9 years to 11 years old at initial surgery; (3) major thoracic curve; (4) had "final" SF. A second multicenter database was used to identify SF patient matches. A one-to-one patient match was performed based on age, major curve size, and curve apex. RESULTS: Preoperative age was 10.1 years for GR and 10.8 years for SF (P = 0.003). GR had a mean 2.8 lengthenings before final fusion. Follow-up time after spinal fusion (3.8 vs. 4.5 years; P = 0.51) and age at latest follow-up (16.4 vs. 15.3 years; P = 0.28) were similar between GR and SF groups. Initial curve correction was significantly greater for SF compared with GR after initial GR surgery (71% vs. 38%; P < 0.001). SF patients had better overall curve correction at latest follow-up (63% vs. 44%; P = 0.08). Overall increase in T1-S1 was 23% for GR and 19% for SF (P = 0.42). Overall increase in T1-T12 was 19% for GR and 17% for SF (P = 0.76). Complications requiring unplanned surgery occurred in one GR patient and two SF patients. Number of surgeries was significantly higher in GR (54) compared with SF (13). CONCLUSION: SF patients had greater curve correction and marginally less spinal and thoracic height gain compared with GR patients. GR patients underwent significantly more surgical procedures. These findings suggest GR treatment does not benefit older patients with juvenile idiopathic scoliosis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Reoperation rates in minimally invasive, hybrid and open surgical treatment for adult spinal deformity with minimum 2-year follow-up.

INTRODUCTION: Minimally invasive surgical (MIS) techniques are gaining popularity in the treatment of adult spinal deformity (ASD). The premise is that MIS techniques will lead to equivalent outcomes and a reduction in perioperative complications when compared with open techniques. Potential issues with MIS techniques are a limited capacity to correct lumbar lordosis, unknown long-term efficacy, and the potential need for revision surgery. This study compares reoperation rates and reasons for reoperation following MIS, hybrid, and open surgery for ASD through multicenter database analysis. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed a prospective multicenter ASD database comparing open and MIS correction techniques. Inclusion criteria were: age > 18 years with minimum 20° coronal lumbar Cobb angle, a minimum of three levels fused, and minimum 2-year follow-up. Patients were propensity matched for preoperative sagittal vertebral axis (SVA), pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL), and number of levels fused. We included 189 patients from three propensity-matched subgroups of 63 patients each: (1) MIS: lateral or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (LIF) and percutaneous pedicle instrumentation, (2) Hybrid: MIS LIF with open posterior segmental fixation (PSF), and (3) OPEN: open posterior fixation ± osteotomies. RESULTS: With propensity matching, there were significant differences between groups in pre-op SVA or PI-LL (p > 0.05). The MIS group had significantly fewer levels fused (5.4) (0-14) than the OPEN group (7.4) (p = 0.002) (0-17). The rate of revision surgery was significantly different between the groups with a higher rate of revision (27 %) amongst the HYB group versus MIS = 11.1 %, and OPEN = 12.0 %. The most common reason for reoperation in the OPEN and HYB groups was a postoperative neurological deficit (7.9 and 11.1 %), respectively. The most common reason for reoperation in the MIS group was pseudoarthrosis (7.9 %). CONCLUSIONS: Reoperation rates were not statistically different among the MIS, and OPEN surgical groups, but differed significantly on multivariate analysis with HYB group. The incidence of reoperations was twice as high in the Hybrid group compared to OPEN and MIS.

Comparison of Complications and Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes Between Nonobese and Obese Patients with Adult Spinal Deformity Undergoing Minimally Invasive Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Obesity can be associated with increased complications and potentially worse outcomes. We aimed to evaluate the impact of obesity on complications and outcomes in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) who underwent minimally invasive surgery (MIS). METHODS: A multicenter database of patients with ASD treated via MIS was queried. Of 190 patients in the database, 77 fit the inclusion criteria of 3 or more spinal levels treated minimally invasively. Patients were divided by body mass index (BMI) <30 (nonobese; n = 59) and BMI ≥ 30 (obese; n = 18). RESULTS: Mean BMI was 24.6 nonobese and 35.0 obese (P < 0.001). There were mean 3.8 interbody fusions nonobese and 4.7 obese (P = 0.065). Levels treated posteriorly averaged 5.8 nonobese and 5.9 obese (P = 0.502). Mean follow-up was 34.4 months nonobese and 35.3 months obese (P = 0.976). Baseline radiographic parameters were similar between groups. Postoperatively, SVA averaged 83.9 mm obese and 20.4 mm nonobese (P = 0.002). Postoperative lumbar lordosis-pelvic incidence mismatch averaged 17.9° obese and 9.9° nonobese (P = 0.028). Both groups had improvement in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores with no difference in postoperative ODI scores between groups (P = 0.090). Similarly, both groups had decreased VAS scores for back and leg pain with no difference between groups postoperatively. Twenty (33.9%) nonobese patients versus 7 (38.9%) obese patients had complications (P = 0.452). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that obesity does not negatively impact complication rate or clinical outcomes in patients with ASD treated via MIS approaches.

Does Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Posterior Instrumentation Reduce Risk of Proximal Junctional Kyphosis in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery? A Propensity-Matched Cohort Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) is a known complication after spinal deformity surgery. One potential cause is disruption of posterior muscular tension band during pedicle screw placement. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) on PJK. METHODS: A multicenter database of patients who underwent deformity surgery was propensity matched for pelvic incidence (PI) to lumbar lordosis (LL) mismatch and change in LL. Radiographic PJK was defined as proximal junctional angle >10°. Sixty-eight patients made up the circumferential MIS (cMIS) group, and 68 were in the hybrid (HYB) surgery group (open screw placement). RESULTS: Preoperatively, there was no difference in age, body mass index, PI-LL mismatch, or sagittal vertical axis. The mean number of levels treated posteriorly was 4.7 for cMIS and 8.2 for HYB (P < .001). Both had improved LL and PI-LL mismatch postoperatively. Sagittal vertical axis remained physiological for the cMIS and HYB groups. Oswestry Disability Index scores were significantly improved in both groups. Radiographic PJK developed in 31.3% of the cMIS and 52.9% of the HYB group (P = .01). Reoperation for PJK was 4.5% for the cMIS and 10.3% for the HYB group (P = .20). Subgroup analysis for patients undergoing similar levels of posterior instrumentation in the cMIS and HYB groups found a PJK rate of 48.1% and 53.8% (P = .68) and a reoperation rate of 11.1% and 19.2%, respectively (P = .41). Mean follow-up was 32.8 months. CONCLUSION: Overall rates of radiographic PJK and reoperation for PJK were not significantly decreased with MIS pedicle screw placement. However, a larger comparative study is needed to confirm that MIS pedicle screw placement does not affect PJK.

Fluctuations in Spinal Cord Perfusion During Adult Spinal Deformity Correction Identify Neurologic Changes: Proof of Concept.

INTRODUCTION: Adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery carries the risk of spinal cord injury. Spinal cord ischemia is often implicated in the pathogenesis but has not been directly investigated. Here we present our index case as a proof of concept for a study evaluating the role of spinal cord perfusion (SCP) changes in ASD correction. METHODS: ASD surgery was performed in the usual fashion with the addition of 1) SCP monitoring, using laser Doppler probe fixated to the dura at the level of the pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) and 2) intrathecal pressure monitoring, using a lumbar drain. Somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) and motor evoked potential (MEP) were monitored throughout the case. RESULTS: An 84-year-old male with kyphoscoliosis and progressive myelopathy causing diminished motor and sensory function was treated with T4 PSO and long segment reconstruction. At baseline, SSEP signals were detectable in all 4 extremities, MEP signals were present in the right foot only, intrathecal pressure was 4 mm Hg, and mean SCP was 21.2 perfusion units. The osteotomy was performed and reduced in 2 steps. After the first step of reduction, MEP signals appeared in the left leg and increased in amplitude in the right leg, and SCP simultaneously increased to 205.6. Further reduction led to MEP signal loss in both legs and decrease in SCP to 39.2. With partial reversal of the reduction, MEP signals returned in both legs and SCP improved to 76.0. Final reduction maneuvers were then performed in a delayed fashion before closure, with stable MEP signals and a final SCP of 42.9. SSEP signals, vital signs, and intrathecal pressure were stable throughout the case. Postoperatively the patient was neurologically stable. CONCLUSIONS: The present case provides the first direct evidence that fluctuations in SCP may contribute to neurologic changes during ASD surgery. Further investigation is under way to further elucidate the underlying mechanisms, with the ultimate goal of developing targeted strategies for spinal cord protection during these high-risk cases.

Can a Minimal Clinically Important Difference Be Achieved in Elderly Patients with Adult Spinal Deformity Who Undergo Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgery?

BACKGROUND: Older age has been considered a relative contraindication to complex spinal procedures. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) techniques to treat patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) have emerged with the potential benefit of decreased approach-related morbidity. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) could be achieved in patients ages ≥ 65 years with ASD who underwent MIS. METHODS: Multicenter database of patients who underwent MIS for ASD was queried. Outcome metrics assessed were Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and visual analog scale (VAS) scores for back and leg pain. On the basis of published reports, MCID was defined as a positive change of 12.8 ODI, 1.2 VAS back pain, and 1.6 VAS leg pain. RESULTS: Forty-two patients were identified. Mean age was 70.3 years; 31 (73.8%) were women. Preoperatively, mean coronal curve, pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence to lumbar lordosis mismatch, and sagittal vertical axis were 35°, 24.6°, 14.2°, and 4.7 cm, respectively. Postoperatively, mean coronal curve, pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence to lumbar lordosis, and sagittal vertical axis were 18°, 25.4°, 11.9°, and 4.9 cm, respectively. A mean of 5.0 levels was treated posteriorly, and a mean of 4.0 interbody fusions was performed. Mean ODI improved from 47.1 to 25.1. Mean VAS back and leg pain scores improved from 6.8 and 5.9 to 2.7 and 2.7, respectively. Mean follow-up was 32.1 months. For ODI, 64.3% of patients achieved MCID. For VAS back and leg pain, 82.9% and 72.2%, respectively, reached MCID. CONCLUSIONS: MCID represents the threshold at which patients feel a meaningful clinical improvement has occurred. Our study results suggest that the majority of elderly patients with modest ASD can achieve MCID with MIS.

Postoperative Recovery After Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: Comparative Analysis of Age in 149 Patients During 2-year Follow-up.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of a multicenter, prospective adult spinal deformity (ASD) database. OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that increased age and increased preoperative disability would negatively impact both the length of time needed to achieve maximal recovery and the amount of functional improvement achieved. In order to gauge the recovery process, a normalization process was used to calculate an integrated health state (IHS) during the 2-year postoperative period. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Elderly patients with ASD generally have worse baseline health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measures than younger patients. Current methods of reporting outcomes are limited, perhaps diminishing the health impact of the entire postoperative recovery experience. METHODS: Inclusion criteria included 18 or more years and ASD. Patient groups: young (≤45 yr), middle (46-64), elderly (≥65) as well as by baseline Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores: MILD (0-30), MEDIUM (31-49), and HIGH (≥50). Collected HRQOL measures included ODI, Short Form-36(PCS/MCS), and Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS22) at baseline, 6 weeks, 1, and 2-year postoperative. All HRQOL measures were normalized to each patient's baseline scores. A 2-year IHS was calculated for each individual patient and the means were compared between groups. RESULTS: 149 patients were included (≤45:32, 46-64:67, ≥65:50). All groups significantly improved in all HRQOL at 2-year compared with baseline (P < 0.05) except for MCS, ODI, and SRS activity for the 45 or less group (P > 0.05). Normalized IHS HRQOL for young patients was worse than elderly for ODI, PCS, MCS, SRS activity, pain and total during the 2-year recovery period from index surgery. The MILD ODI group had significantly worse 2-year IHS values than the HIGH group for all HRQOL measured (P < 0.05) except SRS appearance and satisfaction (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Contrary to our hypothesis, an IHS analysis suggested that the recovery process was significantly better for elderly patients than young patients and better for patients with high baseline disability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Radiographic outcomes of anterior column realignment for adult sagittal plane deformity: a multicenter analysis.

PURPOSE: Anterior column reconstruction (ACR) is a minimally invasive technique for the treatment of sagittal plane deformity. ACR uses a lateral transpsoas approach with ALL release and the application of an interbody device to achieve correction. Here, we present 1-year radiographic results from a multicenter study of adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients. METHODS: A multicenter database was queried from 2005 to 2013 for ASD patients treated with ACR. Demographics, surgical data, and radiographic measurements were collected and retrospectively analyzed. Radiographic time points included preoperative (pre-op), postoperative (post-op; first visit prior to 3 months), and last follow-up (last FU; minimum of 1 year). Sagittal radiographic measurements included regional lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), T1 spinopelvic inclination (T1SPi), and segmental lordosis (disc angle). RESULTS: Mean patient age was 67.4 years (range 46.5-80.0) and 11 patients (32.4 %) were male. Twenty patients (58.8 %) had previous lumbar surgery. All patients had a minimal of one-level ACR with ALL release (mean 1.7; range 1-4). Mean number of lateral interbody fusion (LLIF) levels without ALL release per patient was 0.7 (range 0-3). Thirty-three patients (97.1 %) received supplemental posterior fixation and 1 patient (2.9 %) had lateral fixation only. In 26 patients (76.5 %), supplemental posterior fixation was performed using an open approach, and 7 patients (20.6 %) were treated with percutaneous placement. Mean of number of levels fused was 7.1 (range 2-16). There was a significant improvement in LL (p < 0.001), PI-LL mismatch (p < 0.001), and PT (p = 0.03) from pre-op to post-op, and pre-op to last FU. There was no change in T1SPi, SS, or PI. Segmental lordosis improved at ACR levels from mean of -2.2° pre-op to -16.0° post-op (p < 0.01) and -16.3° at last FU (p < 0.001). The addition of posterior column osteotomy increased the change in segmental lordosis with ACR by 72.7 % (p < 0.001). LLIF without ALL release led to significant improvement in segmental lordosis from pre-op (-2.4°) to post-op (-7.1°; p < 0.01) but not from pre-op to last FU (-5.7°; p = 0.06). CONCLUSION: ACR successfully restores lumbar lordosis in ASD patients with sagittal imbalance. ACR results in greater segmental correction than is achieved with LLIF alone. Supplementing with posterior osteotomies allows for even greater correction. The ability to achieve the desired radiographic goals is expected to improve as technical nuances are refined and patient selection is optimized.